AI-Assisted Policy Marker Assessment for International Aid Projects
Eligibility & Public Benefits · Planning & Decision-making
What it collects
- Project summaries entered by GAC staff into the web-based application. These summaries describe international assistance project activities and objectives, and are generated during GAC's existing grant and contribution management processes. The register confirms no personal information is involved.
- Policy assessment frameworks and domain knowledge encoded within the system, derived from manual assessments used as a gold standard during development. These represent institutional knowledge about Canada's international assistance policy objectives.
- Run by
- Global Affairs Canada (GAC)
- Where
- No fixed location
- Kept
- Not stated by the Helpful Places.
- Shared with
- Accountable organization
- Your copy
- You cannot see the data it holds about you. What you can do
What it is for
This tool uses generative AI to automatically assign policy markers to international assistance project summaries submitted by Global Affairs Canada staff. It encodes the assessment frameworks and domain knowledge of experienced evaluators to help staff quickly determine how projects align with policy objectives. The system produces an explanation alongside each marker assignment so that experts can review and verify the results. It does not process personal information.
What it collects and what happens to it
Data taken in
- Project summaries entered by GAC staff into the web-based application. These summaries describe international assistance project activities and objectives, and are generated during GAC's existing grant and contribution management processes. The register confirms no personal information is involved.
- Policy assessment frameworks and domain knowledge encoded within the system, derived from manual assessments used as a gold standard during development. These represent institutional knowledge about Canada's international assistance policy objectives.
Processing
- Generative AI methods are used to encode assessment frameworks and evaluator domain knowledge, enabling the system to read project summaries in natural language and assign policy markers with explanations comparable in accuracy to expert human assessors.
- Classifies project summaries against multiple policy marker categories, selecting the most relevant markers. Accuracy is described as comparable to expert assessors, validated against manual assessments used as a gold standard.
What it does
- Uses generative AI to encode assessment frameworks and the domain knowledge of experienced evaluators, producing policy marker assignments and accompanying explanations from project summaries. Expert staff review and validate the outputs.
- Classifies and ranks project descriptions against multiple policy markers, selecting the most relevant markers for each project. Outputs are advisory — human experts retain final decision authority.
Outputs
- Policy marker assignments and accompanying explanations for each project summary. These are advisory outputs — staff can review the reasoning and override or validate the suggested markers. The register confirms no personal information is produced.
- Natural-language explanations generated by the AI to accompany each policy marker assignment, enabling expert oversight and review of the system's reasoning. The content explains why specific markers were selected for a given project description.
Run by
- Global Affairs Canada is the federal department responsible for managing most of Canada's international assistance funding. It developed and deploys this AI tool to automate policy marker assessments for grants and contributions projects.
Built by
- The system was developed internally by the Government of Canada, with Global Affairs Canada as the primary developer and owner of the solution.
Kept for
Not stated by the Helpful Places.
Shared with
- Outputs — policy marker assignments and explanations — are accessible to Global Affairs Canada staff (GC employees) who use the web-based tool. The register identifies primary users as GC employees only.
- The tool is an internal government application for GC employees only. Members of the public and affected project applicants do not have access to the tool's outputs or the policy marker assignments it generates.
Stored
Not stated by the Helpful Places.
How to read the colours
Can it identify you?
- Anonymized data
- Data about people with the link to who is broken. Stripped of identifiers, blurred, aggregated, or noised so this system can’t reasonably tie a record back to an individual.
- Pseudonymous data
- Each person’s data is tied to a token (hash, ID, template) that lets this system recognise the same person across events, but the token itself doesn’t reveal a name. Reidentification is possible with extra information.
- Identifiable data
- The data either contains a direct identifier (name, address, account name, recognisable face or voice, plate number) or carries a token this system uses to look up legal identity during processing.
Who completes the loop?
- Human decides
- This mode suggests; a person decides what to do next. The AI is always advisory — a human is in the loop on every decision. Example: a triage tool ranks cases for a clinician who chooses which to see first.
- Human executes
- This mode decides; a person carries out the result. Example: an optimizer plans the day’s trash-collection routes, and drivers run them.
- Autonomous
- This mode decides and acts on its own. No person reviews each decision or carries out the resulting action.
Definitions from the DTPR standard. Amber is about your data, violet about who decides. The fuller the shape and the deeper the colour, the more identifying the data or the less a person is involved.
- AI registerGovernment of Canada Algorithmic Impact Assessment Register — Enhanced Reporting Capabilities for International Assistance Grants and Contributions (2526-GAC-AMC-006)Global Affairs Canada, AI Register ID 2526-GAC-AMC-006, retrieved 2026-05-08.
- AI registerGC AI Register — 2526-GAC-AMC-006
- AI registerGC AI Register — 2526-GAC-AMC-006
- Register entryPublished by the Helpful Places. Reference 3f91e061. This disclosure was drafted with AI assistance.Schema: ai@2026-05-06-beta
What you can do
Ask about this system
Questions go to the Helpful Places, not the vendor.
Your rights
- Right to Algorithmic TransparencyGlobal Affairs Canada has disclosed AI use to users of this tool. The system produces an accompanying explanation with each policy marker assignment to allow expert oversight and to make the AI's reasoning legible to reviewing staff.
- Right to a Human ReviewThe tool is currently in validation and is designed for expert oversight. Expert staff review and can override or validate policy marker assignments produced by the AI. The system is explicitly advisory, with human evaluators retaining authority over final assessments.
Risks and safeguards
- Reputational harmInaccurate policy marker assignments could mischaracterize projects, affecting funding decisions or the reputations of project proponents.Safeguard: The system's accuracy was validated against manual assessments as a gold standard; the tool produces explanations to enable expert review; the system is currently in validation and human experts retain oversight authority over all outputs.
- Loss of autonomyAutomated policy marker assignments could create anchoring bias, nudging expert reviewers toward accepting AI outputs without independent judgment.Safeguard: The system is designed as explicitly advisory; explanations are provided with each assignment to support independent expert evaluation; the tool is in validation phase with human oversight built into the workflow.