AI-Assisted Extraction of Spectrum Licence Conditions
Planning & Decision-making · Enforcement
What it collects
- Unstructured spectrum licencing documents from the Spectrum and Telecommunications Sector, sourced from publicly available regulatory records and official publications. No personal information is involved.
- Run by
- Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED)
- Where
- No fixed location
- Kept
- Not stated by the Helpful Places.
- Shared with
- Accountable organization
- Your copy
- You cannot see the data it holds about you. What you can do
What it is for
This system uses large language models and retrieval-augmented generation to automatically extract and structure spectrum licence conditions from regulatory documents published by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. It is designed for use by Government of Canada employees to reduce manual review work and improve access to critical regulatory information. The system is still in development, does not process personal information, and users are informed when AI is involved.
What it collects and what happens to it
Data taken in
- Unstructured spectrum licencing documents from the Spectrum and Telecommunications Sector, sourced from publicly available regulatory records and official publications. No personal information is involved.
Processing
- Large language models (LLMs) are used to read and interpret unstructured regulatory text and produce structured, machine-readable extractions of spectrum licence conditions.
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is employed to surface relevant regulatory passages from spectrum documents, grounding LLM outputs in authoritative source material for accurate licence condition extraction.
What it does
- Uses large language models to extract, organise, and structure regulatory and technical rules from unstructured documents, producing machine-readable outputs. GC employees review and act on the structured outputs; the system is advisory.
- Retrieval-augmented generation is used to find and ground outputs in relevant regulatory passages, enabling accurate extraction of licence conditions from large corpora of spectrum documents.
Outputs
- Structured, machine-readable extractions of spectrum licence conditions derived from regulatory documents. Outputs are administrative records about regulatory rules, not about any individual person.
Run by
- The federal department developing and deploying this AI system to automate extraction of spectrum licence conditions from regulatory documents for use by its employees in the Spectrum and Telecommunications Sector.
Automated Information Extraction of Spectrum Licence Conditions — Government of Canada AI Register
Built by
- The system was developed internally by the Government of Canada, with no external vendor identified in the register entry.
Automated Information Extraction of Spectrum Licence Conditions — Government of Canada AI Register
Kept for
Not stated by the Helpful Places.
Shared with
- The system's outputs are intended for internal use by GC employees in the Spectrum and Telecommunications Sector. There is no indication that members of the public can directly access the system or its outputs.
- GC employees at Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada have access to the structured outputs produced by the system.
Stored
Not stated by the Helpful Places.
How to read the colours
Can it identify you?
- Anonymized data
- Data about people with the link to who is broken. Stripped of identifiers, blurred, aggregated, or noised so this system can’t reasonably tie a record back to an individual.
- Pseudonymous data
- Each person’s data is tied to a token (hash, ID, template) that lets this system recognise the same person across events, but the token itself doesn’t reveal a name. Reidentification is possible with extra information.
- Identifiable data
- The data either contains a direct identifier (name, address, account name, recognisable face or voice, plate number) or carries a token this system uses to look up legal identity during processing.
Who completes the loop?
- Human decides
- This mode suggests; a person decides what to do next. The AI is always advisory — a human is in the loop on every decision. Example: a triage tool ranks cases for a clinician who chooses which to see first.
- Human executes
- This mode decides; a person carries out the result. Example: an optimizer plans the day’s trash-collection routes, and drivers run them.
- Autonomous
- This mode decides and acts on its own. No person reviews each decision or carries out the resulting action.
Definitions from the DTPR standard. Amber is about your data, violet about who decides. The fuller the shape and the deeper the colour, the more identifying the data or the less a person is involved.
- AI registerAutomated Information Extraction of Spectrum Licence Conditions — Government of Canada AI RegisterAI Register ID: 2526-ISED-ISDE-014. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada.
- AI registerAutomated Information Extraction of Spectrum Licence Conditions — Government of Canada AI Register
- AI registerAutomated Information Extraction of Spectrum Licence Conditions — Government of Canada AI Register
- Register entryPublished by the Helpful Places. Reference 3c030f68. This disclosure was drafted with AI assistance.Schema: ai@2026-05-06-beta
What you can do
Ask about this system
Questions go to the Helpful Places, not the vendor.
Your rights
- Right to Algorithmic TransparencyThe Government of Canada discloses AI use to users of this system. The system is listed on the public Government of Canada AI Register, where its capabilities, data sources, and development status are described.
Risks and safeguards
- Societal & cultural harmLLMs may misextract or mischaracterise regulatory conditions, potentially leading to inaccurate spectrum analytics and flawed evidence-based decisions.Safeguard: The system is still in development; outputs are reviewed by GC employees, and AI use is disclosed to all users. The register notes that the approach addresses error-proneness of manual review, suggesting ongoing accuracy validation.