Skip to content
This is NOT an official site of the Government of Canada. Click here for the official AI registry.

AI-Assisted Triage of Temporary Resident Visa Applications

Border & Immigration · Risk Assessment & Triage

What it collects that can identify you

Sensitive personal information
Identifiable data
  • Personal information submitted by applicants in their overseas temporary resident visa application, including data elements with a direct link to legislative and regulatory eligibility requirements. Classified up to Protected B/C. Collected and controlled by IRCC.

Also collects operational data, which is anonymized data.

Run by
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)
Where
No fixed location
Kept
Retained Not specified in the AIA; subject to IRCC's standard records retention schedules and applicable Privacy Impact Assessments
Shared with
Accountable organization
Your copy
You cannot see the data it holds about you. What you can do

What it is for

This system uses advanced data analytics to sort overseas temporary resident visa applications by complexity and automatically approve eligibility for routine cases, freeing immigration officers to focus on more complex applications. Officers retain final decision-making authority on every application, including all admissibility assessments. The use of automated decision-making in this process is disclosed to applicants.

What it collects and what happens to it

Data taken in

Sensitive personal information
Identifiable data
  • Personal information submitted by applicants in their overseas temporary resident visa application, including data elements with a direct link to legislative and regulatory eligibility requirements. Classified up to Protected B/C. Collected and controlled by IRCC.
Operational data
Anonymized data
  • Historical visa application records and processing data from IRCC used to train and validate the model rules, collected and controlled by IRCC. Data is sourced from multiple internal systems.

Processing

Classification & Prediction
  • Applies rule-based classification and predictive analytics to assign applications to complexity tiers and to determine whether a positive eligibility determination can be automated. Rules are linked to established eligibility criteria in legislation and policy.
Clustering & Segmentation
  • Clusters and segments application patterns to identify routine versus complex cases, supporting the tiering logic used to route applications to automated or manual processing paths.

What it does

Deciding (Analytical AI)
Human executes
  • The system classifies and tiers visa applications by complexity score and automatically approves eligibility for routine applications. Officers carry out the admissibility assessment and render the final decision on every application, including those that received an automated positive eligibility determination.

Outputs

A decision about you
Identifiable data
  • Automated positive eligibility determinations for routine temporary resident visa applications. The system only produces positive determinations; it never refuses applications or recommends refusals. All applications proceed to an officer for admissibility assessment and final decision.
A recommendation or prediction
Identifiable data
  • Complexity tier assignments that route applications to appropriate processing paths (streamlined or full manual review). Officers are not informed of the specific rules or analysis behind the triage and receive no recommendations from the system — they conduct individualized assessments.

Run by

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)
  • The federal department responsible for deploying and operating this automated triage system for overseas temporary resident visa applications.

Government of Canada AI Register — IRCC entry

Built by

Not stated by the Helpful Places.

Kept for

Retained Not specified in the AIA; subject to IRCC's standard records retention schedules and applicable Privacy Impact Assessments
  • The AIA confirms a Privacy Impact Assessment has been conducted and that personal information use is consistent with current Personal Information Banks. Specific retention duration is not stated in the available documents.
  • Duration: Not specified in the AIA; subject to IRCC's standard records retention schedules and applicable Privacy Impact Assessments

Shared with

Available to the accountable organization
  • Output data and audit trails are available to IRCC. A comprehensive audit trail records all recommendations and decisions made by the system, identifies all key decision points, tracks system changes, and logs override instances. Access is controlled through a permission management process.
Not available to me
  • Individual applicants do not have direct access to the outputs or reasoning of the automated triage system. Officers reviewing applications are also not informed of the specific rules used by the system for triage or automated positive eligibility determinations.

Stored

Stored locally
  • Data is controlled by the federal government (IRCC) and collected by IRCC. The system operates within federal government infrastructure. The AIA indicates the system is not in a closed system with no internet connections, but data is under federal government control.
  • Duration: Not specified; subject to IRCC retention schedules
How to read the colours

Can it identify you?

Anonymized data
Data about people with the link to who is broken. Stripped of identifiers, blurred, aggregated, or noised so this system can’t reasonably tie a record back to an individual.
Pseudonymous data
Each person’s data is tied to a token (hash, ID, template) that lets this system recognise the same person across events, but the token itself doesn’t reveal a name. Reidentification is possible with extra information.
Identifiable data
The data either contains a direct identifier (name, address, account name, recognisable face or voice, plate number) or carries a token this system uses to look up legal identity during processing.

Who completes the loop?

Human decides
This mode suggests; a person decides what to do next. The AI is always advisory — a human is in the loop on every decision. Example: a triage tool ranks cases for a clinician who chooses which to see first.
Human executes
This mode decides; a person carries out the result. Example: an optimizer plans the day’s trash-collection routes, and drivers run them.
Autonomous
This mode decides and acts on its own. No person reviews each decision or carries out the resulting action.

Definitions from the DTPR standard. Amber is about your data, violet about who decides. The fuller the shape and the deeper the colour, the more identifying the data or the less a person is involved.

What you can do

Ask about this system

Questions go to the Helpful Places, not the vendor.

Your rights

  • Right to Be Informed of AI UseApplicants are informed that automated decision-making is used in processing their temporary resident visa application. A plain language notice is posted through all service delivery channels in use (Internet, in person, mail, or telephone) as required under the Government of Canada Directive on Automated Decision-Making.
  • Right to a Human ReviewAll applications — including those where eligibility was automatically approved — are reviewed by an immigration officer for admissibility and a final decision. Officers may revisit any automated positive eligibility determination if they encounter relevant information during their review. No final decision is made solely by the automated system.
  • Right to ContestA recourse process is established for clients who wish to challenge a decision. Applicants whose visa applications are refused can re-apply at any time. The AIA notes that IRCC approves many clients with prior refusals.
  • Right to Algorithmic TransparencyThe use of AI in visa processing is publicly disclosed. The algorithmic process is described as not difficult to interpret or explain (per the AIA). Model rules are linked to established eligibility criteria in legislation and policy. The AIA and system details are published on the Government of Canada Open Data Portal.

Risks and safeguards

  • Civil liberties harmAutomated decisions in immigration processing may affect mobility rights and freedom of movement for applicants, and may disproportionately affect applicants from certain countries or demographics. The system only automates positive eligibility determinations and never refuses applications, limiting direct harm. Mitigations include: Gender-Based Analysis Plus (GBA+) of data; bias testing against documented processes; review of model rules by experienced officers, legal, policy, data science, and privacy experts; regular monitoring and quality assurance; plain language notice to applicants about AI use; full officer review of all applications for admissibility; and a recourse process for applicants wishing to challenge decisions.
  • Reputational harmErroneous triage or misclassification could stigmatize applicants or lead to unfair processing disparities across demographic groups. Mitigations include documented processes to test datasets against biases, Gender-Based Analysis Plus, ongoing quality assurance and monitoring to detect unforeseen bias or discrimination, and human override capability allowing officers to revisit eligibility determinations when new information comes to light.